Channel 5 has never been a broadcaster to shy away from a tabloid-friendly dramatisation. From the “house of horror” re-enactments to the semi-regular thrillers that populate the mid-week schedule, they know their audience. But with The Fall of Huw Edwards (officially titled Power: The Downfall of Huw Edwards), the stakes were significantly higher. This wasn’t just another true-crime potboiler; it was an attempt to dissect one of the most significant media collapses in modern British history. The question is: does it actually have anything to say, or is it just a high-budget exercise in rubbernecking?
The immediate talking point, and frankly, the only real reason to tune in, is Martin Clunes. Taking on the mantle of a fallen national institution is no small feat, especially when the subject’s face was beamed into our living rooms every night at 10 PM for decades. Clunes is, quite frankly, far too good for the script he’s been given. He doesn’t just mimic the accent or the physical tics; he captures the “vivid and believable” transition from the authoritative, trusted voice of the BBC to a man crumbling under the weight of his own secrets. There is a “go-for-broke” energy to his performance that finds humanity in the wreckage without ever feeling like it’s asking the audience for forgiveness. It is uncanny, at times even uncomfortable, how well he nails the transition between public-facing professionalism and private desperation.
Martin Clunes: A Transformation of Power
The casting of Martin Clunes as Huw Edwards was a choice that raised eyebrows when first announced, but the result is a chillingly accurate portrayal of a man defined by his public mask. Clunes, usually known for his more affable or curmudgeonly roles, completely disappears into the persona of the newsreader.
The performance is built on the subtle markers of authority: the way he holds himself in a suit, the practiced cadence of his speech, and the cold detachment in his eyes when the cameras aren’t rolling. Clunes manages to capture the specific “weight” of a person who has spent decades as the voice of a nation, and he uses that gravity to illustrate how easily power can be weaponised. It is a performance of terrifying normalcy. He doesn’t play Edwards as a pantomime villain; instead, he portrays him as a man who believed his own legend and felt entitled to operate outside the rules that govern everyone else.
A Script of Silence and Secrets
The film’s greatest strength: and perhaps its most controversial element: is its focus on the mechanics of grooming and the abuse of institutional trust. The script doesn’t shy away from the “skin-crawling” reality of the digital interactions, showing how someone with such immense public standing could manipulate those far more vulnerable.
However, the narrative has been noted for its somewhat narrow focus. While the personal tragedy and the immediate victims are handled with a grim seriousness, the film feels slightly rushed when it comes to the institutional accountability of the BBC. The final act, which covers the court cases and the wider fallout, moves at a breakneck speed that leaves little room for the deep-seated analysis of how such a system allowed this to happen for so long. It’s a visceral, impactful drama, but one that leaves the audience with more questions than answers about the structures of power in British media.
However, once you look past Clunes’ towering performance, the film starts to feel incredibly thin. Despite the heavy subject matter, the exploitation of young men, the abuse of power, and the catastrophic failure of institutional oversight, the production itself feels strangely bland. Visually, Channel 5 has opted for a safe, almost sterile aesthetic. It’s all beige office corridors and dimly lit living rooms that scream “made-for-TV” rather than “prestige drama.” There is a lack of visual flair that makes the two-hour runtime feel much longer than it actually is. It captures the facts, sure, but it fails to capture a mood or a specific artistic perspective.
The narrative structure also feels like a bit of a rush-job. It speeds through the timeline of the scandal with the frantic energy of a news ticker, ticking off key events without ever stopping to analyze the why. We see the downfall, but we don’t really see the mechanics of how the culture allowed it to happen for so long. It avoids the deeper, more difficult questions about the nature of celebrity and power in the British media landscape, choosing instead to focus on the immediate, sensational fallout.
There is a sense that the filmmakers were so afraid of legal repercussions or appearing “too sympathetic” that they ended up making something that feels entirely non-committal. It’s a drama that wants to be “brave and necessary,” yet it plays it so safe that it ends up saying very little that wasn’t already covered in the daily headlines. It’s informative, yes, but it isn’t insightful. Compared to other recent dramas exploring similar themes of exploitation, it feels like a missed opportunity to really get under the skin of the story.
Ultimately, The Fall of Huw Edwards is a stellar showcase for Martin Clunes, who proves once again why he is one of the UK’s most versatile actors. He brings a complexity to the role that the writing simply doesn’t support. If you’re a fan of his work, it’s a must-watch for the performance alone. But if you’re looking for a deep, challenging exploration of the scandal that actually adds something new to the conversation, you’re likely to walk away feeling like you’ve just watched a very long, slightly more expensive episode of a news documentary. It’s a polished piece of television, but it lacks the soul and the bite required to make it a truly essential watch.
Filmandtvreview.com 3.5 Out of 5.0 Users 0 (0 votes) F&TVReview Rating 
